When conducting research as a member of the college community, whether at Lethbridge College or under the auspices of Lethbridge College, it is advisable that you be familiar with:

The Research Ethics Board (REB) reviews ethics applications to ensure that research studies meet the highest ethical standards of research involving human participants, in accordance with Lethbridge College’s Research Involving Human Participants Policy and the Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS2).

 

Is it research?

Before you tackle the task of writing an ethics application, you first need to determine if your project is research or quality assurance.

Quality assurance/improvement: When an organization is interested in assessing or improving some aspect of its performance (e.g. job satisfaction, safety compliance), it may conduct quality assurance or improvement studies. Similarly, schools may test their students within normal educational requirements (e.g. to assess knowledge retention). These activities are usually not considered research as defined by TCPS2 and do not require REB review.

It can be difficult to assess if your project is research or quality assurance, so we’ve provided some tools below to help determine where your project fits.

  • ARECCI: Developed by Alberta Innovates Health Solutions (AIHS), this online tool asks a few simple questions to help you perform a self-assessment of your project.
  • Comparison: We’ve created a chart comparing research and quality assurance to help you understand the differences between the two.
  • REB Protocol Guidelines: This document provides more information on how to prepare a REB protocol, including additional exclusions to REB review.
     

Even if you determine your project is quality assurance, it must be conducted in an ethical manner. Please review the AIHS guidelines for conducting projects in an ethically sound manner.

Still unsure if your project is quality assurance or research? Please contact interim REB Coordinator, Andy Benoit, for assistance.

 

Informed consent

Seeking consent for research participation is fundamental to the ethical principle of Respect for Persons. Prospective participants, who have the capacity to consent on their own behalf, have the reasonable expectation that they will be treated as autonomous individuals able to make decisions about the risks they consider acceptable and the information they choose to share with researchers.

As the researcher, it is your responsibility to be aware of any additional consent requirements or regulations that apply to your research. For more information on informed consent, review the REB Protocol Guidelines and the informed consent template.

 

Course-based research

Course-based research varies in scope but includes activities such as students:

  • conducting interviews
  • administering standardized tests
  • distributing questions
     

It also includes conducting projects that pose research questions, gather data from human participants and analyze that data for presentation.

Course-based research activities are different from Professional Skill Development activities, which are exempt from ethical review requirements.

Instructor responsibility

In the case of course-based research, the instructor holds primary responsibility for the ethics review application and for student adherence to ethical treatment of human participants. The student(s) hold secondary responsibility.

 

Submitting a research ethics protocol

Step 1: Review the REB Protocol Guidelines.

Step 2: Have all new investigators, research assistants and student research assistants involved with the project complete the Tri-Council Policy Statement Tutorial.

Step 3: Complete one of the following applications:

Step 4: Submit all documents (TCPS2 certificates, appropriate application form, consent form and all study materials that will be given to or seen by participants) in electronic format to interim Coordinator, Andy Benoit.

 

REB meetings

The REB meets face-to-face on a semi-annual basis, once in the fall and once in the spring. Throughout the academic year, monthly meetings occur electronically and additional face-to-face meetings occur as needed. All applications must be received in full on or before the 15th of each month to be reviewed during the next meeting.

Summer meetings

During the summer months (June to August), it can be difficult to arrange face-to-face meetings. When possible, protocols are reviewed before and after the summer period. However, we understand that some protocols may require REB review during the summer. If this is the case, the review meeting will be facilitated through an electronic format.

 

Research resources

If you are unsure of how to prepare an ethics protocol, our Canvas course can guide you through the process: How to Develop an Ethics Protocol

 

Research ethics forms

Research Ethics Board - application for protocol extension/modification

Research Ethics Board - course-based application

Research Ethics Board - general protocol review

Research Ethics Board - final reporting for research involving human subjects

 

Provincial and federal legislation

Research may be affected by provincial or federal acts respecting the freedom of information and protection of privacy and electronic communications. As a researcher, you should familiarize yourself with the following legislation:

 

Contact us

For more information, application forms and submission deadlines, please contact interim REB Coordinator, Andy Benoit.